<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fully Supported Bias.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loudmouthman.com/2007/05/24/fully-supported-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loudmouthman.com/2007/05/24/fully-supported-bias/</link>
	<description>Social Networker and Opinioneer</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.loudmouthman.com/2007/05/24/fully-supported-bias/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loudmouthman.com/2007/05/24/fully-supported-bias/#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>I don't know... I think he's got some reasonable points, but some are just plain wrong.

Like where he says "Linux ... won't run the latest in hardware" - Linux was the first OS in the world to support USB 2.0 &#38; Bluetooth, amongst numerous other things. 

And trying to turn one single proof-of-concept virus (The OOo one) into proof that Linux is as prone to viruses as Windows... 

Still and all, after so many years of the "Linux will never make it on the desktop" nonsense, it's gratifying to see that virtually every negative review you come across these days, like this one, basically boil down to nothing worse than "Okay, it's a perfectly good desktop, but it doesn't run some of the more obscure proprietary Windows software yet"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230; I think he&#8217;s got some reasonable points, but some are just plain wrong.</p>
<p>Like where he says &#8220;Linux &#8230; won&#8217;t run the latest in hardware&#8221; - Linux was the first OS in the world to support USB 2.0 &amp; Bluetooth, amongst numerous other things. </p>
<p>And trying to turn one single proof-of-concept virus (The OOo one) into proof that Linux is as prone to viruses as Windows&#8230; </p>
<p>Still and all, after so many years of the &#8220;Linux will never make it on the desktop&#8221; nonsense, it&#8217;s gratifying to see that virtually every negative review you come across these days, like this one, basically boil down to nothing worse than &#8220;Okay, it&#8217;s a perfectly good desktop, but it doesn&#8217;t run some of the more obscure proprietary Windows software yet&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
